<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost and the Reverse X-Files Principle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inessentials.com/2010/02/01/lost-and-the-reverse-x-files-principle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inessentials.com/2010/02/01/lost-and-the-reverse-x-files-principle/</link>
	<description>Analysis, criticism, and observations on pop culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://www.inessentials.com/2010/02/01/lost-and-the-reverse-x-files-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inessentials.com/?p=243#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>&quot;The very worst were flashbacks involving Jack, easily the most one-dimensional character at the center of any critically adored drama.&quot;


You believe that Jack Shephard was a one-dimensional character?  Really?  Hmmm.  I guess you&#039;re entitled to your opinion.  I guess I just can&#039;t agree with this assessment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The very worst were flashbacks involving Jack, easily the most one-dimensional character at the center of any critically adored drama.&#8221;</p>
<p>You believe that Jack Shephard was a one-dimensional character?  Really?  Hmmm.  I guess you&#8217;re entitled to your opinion.  I guess I just can&#8217;t agree with this assessment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://www.inessentials.com/2010/02/01/lost-and-the-reverse-x-files-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-2819</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inessentials.com/?p=243#comment-2819</guid>
		<description>&quot;Terry O’Quinn as Locke was the only actor capable of turning any material into a work of art, while episodes focused on Kate, Hurley, Claire, Michael, and Charlie were at the whims of their episodes’ writing and mythologizing.&quot;


I disagree.  I would say that O&#039;Quinn was one of a handful of actors on that show capable of turning any material into a work of art.  I would also include Matthew Fox, Daniel Dae Kim, Yunjin Kim, Harold Perrineau, Elizabeth Mitchell, Michael Emerson and Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje.  I feel they were the best performers in the series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Terry O’Quinn as Locke was the only actor capable of turning any material into a work of art, while episodes focused on Kate, Hurley, Claire, Michael, and Charlie were at the whims of their episodes’ writing and mythologizing.&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree.  I would say that O&#8217;Quinn was one of a handful of actors on that show capable of turning any material into a work of art.  I would also include Matthew Fox, Daniel Dae Kim, Yunjin Kim, Harold Perrineau, Elizabeth Mitchell, Michael Emerson and Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje.  I feel they were the best performers in the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

